I was at the big release of the European Chamber's 2009 "Position Paper," a 500-page document talking about all the things Europe really hopes China will do over the next year. An event that to my surprise had pretty much every major journalist I could think of there.
Though I plan on delving into the 500 page document over the next few days (half of it is just a translation of the other half), what really was the most important aspect of the meeting for me was the constant regurgitation of the word "transparency." They took the very correct position, that the Chinese government can do pretty much whatever it wants, as long as its open about it, and discusses it with the business community first. I.e. Green Dam Mandate - they didn't announce it early enough to work out all the bugs. Or the Rio Tinto case - no one has any clue what information is protected by national security laws, so no one knows if they are breaking any laws.
Joerg Wuttke, the president of the chamber, made the simple statement that "corruption is a cancer in any economy," but it can only be fought bey transparency.
There was some other rather fun stuff relating to protectionism in the greentech sector. Particularly the highly publicized wind turbine case. I've noted previously that government intervention in this sector is already an issue, and the chamber implied that having a bunch of people jumping for handouts is seriously distorting the market (the term they used was that the market was "price driven," which is why the State Council said it would cut down on overcapacity soon.
Last thing on the someone saying something I wanted to hear list. Is that Wuttke argued that "SOEs (state-owned enterprises) are the big winners of the financial crisis." Which is what I've been saying all along.






